Summary of argument: Physicians and associations of physicians - Respondents - have Article III standing to bring this action. They are the ones in direct contact with the women and girls needing care. The emergency room physicians are the ones to whom the FDA and the abortion industry are passing off women and girls in medical crisis.
This causes direct injury to the physicians providing the care, by the very nature of what is creating the emergency - a child's death and a physically and emotionally traumatized mother. Respondents come face to face with this, regularly, as a result of FDA's actions approving the chemical-induced death of the child, and the removal of the minimum safeguards in place prior to 2016. The injuries to Respondents are directly related to FDA's actions in approving the drug for market and the subsequent actions of the agency, thereafter. Danco, as the manufacturer of the approved chemical abortifacient, is equally culpable for this harm. Respondents have standing to bring this action. The injury to Respondents is directly related to FDA's actions, and the harm can be redressed by affirming the District Court.
Much harm has come to women from abortion. The FDA has chosen to look away from the harm, arbitrarily and capriciously superfluous. Its actions of approving the drug, then eliminating minimal safeguards (REMS) and removing the reporting of almost all adverse events, combined with no physician prescriber and mail-order delivery is arbitrary and capricious. The FDA has chosen to look away from the pain and the harm to women and girls for which it is responsible. This brief is an invitation to stare into the ugly truth of abortion - to not look away.
Continue reading entire Brief:
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kol/BriefWomenInjuredbyAbortion.pdf