This is a test. Answer this typical diversity question, "What are your preferred pronouns?" The correct answer is "None." I do not have any pronouns that are based on my preferences. My pronouns are based on biology.
A form has asked me a more egregious and obviously loaded question: "What was your gender assigned at birth?" Again, the obvious answer is "None." My gender was assigned at conception. My name and Medicare number were assigned at birth. My gender, blood type, and birth weight were determined at birth. This question conveys that my real gender was what I decided later in life.
The film "What is a Woman?" explores and exposes transgender ideology. In it, Matt Walsh often asks a trans activist the seemingly simple question of, "What is a woman?" He fails to get an answer. They could only have given the ever-so-slightly circular definition of "A woman is someone who identifies as a woman."
Watch the official trailer for "What is a Woman" below:
.
.
Meanings of words can change; 'gay' is a prime example, which used to mean 'happy'. Back when my grandkids think I had a dinosaur as a pet, my high school song included the line, "Clover Park where friends are gay." Yes, it has been subsequently changed.
'She' has always referred to a female until recently. Now, with the continuous assault on our language, it means someone who identifies as a female, regardless of basic biology.
It may be hard to wrap your head around the fact that the meaning of such a basic word has changed, but we are being compelled to use "he" and "she" that way.
I respect those who are fighting against the tide to reclaim the original meaning of "he" and "she". But there is another way to transform the conversation back to biological reality with a simple move that defies corruption.
.
.
Because "he" and "she" have been redefined, I revolt at having these terms used for myself. Accepting "he" as a label conveys that the only reason I am a "he" is because I have identified as one for at least the last four hours or so.
If I am compelled to acknowledge the fantasy pronouns of Carl-who-has-become-Cathy, I demand the same respect for my preferred pronoun. My preferred pronoun is XY, and one for a wife would be XX. These are the names of biological chromosomes that really determine sex.
If you needed to put these in the he/him/his format, they would be XY/XY/XYs.
Just as Carl-who-has-changed would revolt at being called "Mr.", I strenuously object to being called "Mr Irvin" because "Mr." is the same degraded gender term as "he."
Instead, call me "XY Irvin." I would love to be a teacher in a public school and say, "Good morning, class!" and demand the reply of all, "Good morning, XY Irvin." If I'm required to accept your fantasy...
One of the perks of using XY and XX is that you can lodge a complaint if someone "misgenders" you by refusing to call you by XY or XX as requested. Those same guys who would pound on you for misgendering Carl-whatever are now obligated to serve you if the reverse happens. If they treat your complaint differently, you have a legally valid discrimination complaint against them!
.
.
You may receive some pushback from those who are foisting this ideology on us and find yourself in a surreal discussion. "You are welcome to use any of the 70-plus genders that are floating around, but XY and XX are not allowed." They may offend those who are imposing this stuff on us. How about us? I personally am offended by the other 68-plus genders that are allowed. If you require us to accept your fantasy, why can't you accept my reality?
We may have the situation where Carl-and-all-that also wants to be called "XX" to foil our scheme. I have heard about gender-reassignment surgery, where you start with a man and convert him into a man with male parts cut out and non-functioning female parts added. How do you propose to perform chromosome-reassignment surgery?
Boys in girls' bathrooms? No problem. Just change the signs to "XY" and "XX". Nobody could complain since you are not discriminating based on gender identity, but based on actual chromosomes.
In summary, from a Christian perspective, this essay provides us with the XY/XX tool to stand with reality. By complying with transgender terminology, we're giving power to the radicals. This proposed strategy, if adopted, transfers power back to reality where gender is innate.
The trans-ideology is not ridiculous, as it seems to some. It is EVIL! Children are being indoctrinated with lies from pre-school; some go on to mutilate their bodies and destroy their lives.
If enough of us demand being called by XY or XX, the radicals may well state, "Let's forget the whole pronoun thing." Wouldn't that be nice?
There are only three genders. They are XY, then XX, and finally Delusional. My preferred and required pronouns are XY/XY/XY.