Indonesia: Human rights defender summoned by police after speaking on TV

Asia Human Rights
February 12, 2016
Reproduced with Permission
Asian Human Rights Commission

Issues: Freedom of opinion, fabrication of criminal charges, fair trial, impunity, human rights defenders


Dear Friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has learnt that the Criminal Investigation Agency of the Police Headquarters (Bareskrim Mabes Polri) has summoned human rights defender Mr. Erwin Natosmal Oemar for questioning regarding his statement on a TV talk show on 25 August 2015. Mr. Erwin works at the Indonesian Legal Roundtable (ILR), an NGO advocating policy on law and human rights. The police have ignored the procedure of the Indonesian Press Council (Dewan Perss), under whose jurisdiction Mr. Erwin's case falls. This is yet another case of rights defenders being criminalised for speaking out against corruption and other ills plaguing Indonesian society.

Case Narrative:

On 25 August 2015, Mr. Erwin was invited to be one of the resource persons at the Indonesia Lawyer Club (ILC) program. Televised by TV One, a national private TV company, the theme of the dialogue was "Impact of Sarpin case: Supreme Court (MA) Vs Judicial Commission (KY)." The dialogue was also attended by others resource persons, including Professor Mahfud MD, former chairperson of the Constitutional Court and Police Inspector General Anton Charliyan, a national police spokesperson.

At one point in the show, Mr. Erwin was asked by the host to comment upon an earlier statement made by Inspector General Anton. Mr. Erwin put forth two points: first, that Inspector General Anton tends to be Judge Sarpin's lawyer rather than a police officer, and second, that the Indonesian police is a machine of criminalization.

Judge Sarpin is the judge who led the pretrial process involving Police Commissaries General Budi Gunawan, a suspect of graft. In his decision, Judge Sarpin canceled the suspect status of General Budi Gunawan, due to which the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) cannot further investigate the case, unless there is enough evidence to rename General Budi as a suspect.

Mr. Erwin's point regarding the criminalization of the police referred to a number of criminalization cases against anti-corruption activists and KPK commissioners who previously named General Budi a suspect of graft.

On 30 December 2015, Mr. Erwin received the first police summons, sent by Bareksrim Mabes Polri, stating that Erwin had violated Article 207 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) on crimes against public authority. So far, Mr. Erwin has received two summon letters, however, he decided not to attend the police examination. Instead he brought the case to the Press Council (Dewan Pers), as it is not a criminal case, rather constitutes a violation of journalism ethics. The Press Council is the only institution entitled to examine violations of journalism ethics. Uninterested in the examination process undertaken by the Press Council, the police continue to insist on questioning Mr. Erwin.

Although the police has summoned Mr. Erwin as a witness, it is likely that he will become a suspect, as according to the Indonesian Penal Code of Procedure (KUHAP), before somebody is named as a suspect, they should become a witness first.

Mr. Erwin's case is only one of many such cases involving human rights defenders in Indonesia. Despite the various threats faced by rights defenders, the government has yet to provide protection for them. Although the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) has established a special desk for dealing with the protection of human rights defenders, it has yet to function effectively as it has no legal basis. Both the government and the parliament have been reluctant in the last decade to continue the drafting process of the bill on human rights defenders' protection.

Additional Information:

In relation to Judge Sarpin and the criminalization against KPK Commissioners, there were no fewer than 51 people criminalized by the Criminal Investigation Department (BARESKRIM), because of their fight for the eradication of corruption, including commissioners of the Judicial Commission, the Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW), and other activists.

Suggested Action: send an appeal letter

Please write to the authorities listed below, asking them to stop the fabrication of criminal charges against human rights defenders and all those who express their thoughts and opinions. These rights are protected both by the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, and international human rights law to which Indonesia is state party, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

The AHRC will write a separate letter to the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, calling for their intervention into this matter.

Sample Letter:

Dear ............,

Indonesia: Human rights defender summoned by police after speaking on TV

Name of victims: Mr. Erwin Natosmal Oemar
Names of alleged perpetrators: National Police
Date of incident: 25 August
2015 Place of incident: Talk Show on TV in Borobudur Hotel, Jakarta, Indonesia

I am writing to voice my deep concern regarding the Criminal Investigation Agency of the Police Headquarters (Bareskrim Mabes Polri) has summoned human rights defender Mr. Erwin Natosmal Oemar for questioning regarding his statement on a TV talk show on 25 August 2015. Mr. Erwin works at the Indonesian Legal Roundtable (ILR), an NGO advocating policy on law and human rights. The police have ignored the procedure of the Indonesian Press Council (Dewan Perss), under whose jurisdiction Mr. Erwin's case falls. This is yet another case of rights defenders being criminalised for speaking out against corruption and other ills plaguing Indonesian society.

On 25 August 2015, Mr. Erwin was invited to be one of the resource persons at the Indonesia Lawyer Club (ILC) program. Televised by TV One, a national private TV company, the theme of the dialogue was "Impact of Sarpin case: Supreme Court (MA) Vs Judicial Commission (KY)." The dialogue was also attended by others resource persons, including Professor Mahfud MD, former chairperson of the Constitutional Court and Police Inspector General Anton Charliyan, a national police spokesperson.

At one point in the show, Mr. Erwin was asked by the host to comment upon an earlier statement made by Inspector General Anton. Mr. Erwin put forth two points: first, that Inspector General Anton tends to be Judge Sarpin's lawyer rather than a police officer, and second, that the Indonesian police is a machine of criminalization.

Judge Sarpin is the judge who led the pretrial process involving Police Commissaries General Budi Gunawan, a suspect of graft. In his decision, Judge Sarpin canceled the suspect status of General Budi Gunawan, due to which the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) cannot further investigate the case, unless there is enough evidence to rename General Budi as a suspect.

Mr. Erwin's point regarding the criminalization of the police referred to a number of criminalization cases against anti-corruption activists and KPK commissioners who previously named General Budi a suspect of graft.

On 30 December 2015, Mr. Erwin received the first police summons, sent by Bareksrim Mabes Polri, stating that Erwin had violated Article 207 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) on crimes against public authority. So far, Mr. Erwin has received two summon letters, however, he decided not to attend the police examination. Instead he brought the case to the Press Council (Dewan Pers), as it is not a criminal case, rather constitutes a violation of journalism ethics. The Press Council is the only institution entitled to examine violations of journalism ethics. Uninterested in the examination process undertaken by the Press Council, the police continue to insist on questioning Mr. Erwin.

Although the police has summoned Mr. Erwin as a witness, it is likely that he will become a suspect, as according to the Indonesian Penal Code of Procedure (KUHAP), before somebody is named as a suspect, they should become a witness first.

Mr. Erwin's case is only one of many such cases involving human rights defenders in Indonesia. Despite the various threats faced by rights defenders, the government has yet to provide protection for them. Although the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) has established a special desk for dealing with the protection of human rights defenders, it has yet to function effectively as it has no legal basis. Both the government and the parliament have been reluctant in the last decade to continue the drafting process of the bill on human rights defenders' protection.

Therefore, I respectfully request you to ensure that the Indonesian police respect and protect the right to freedom of opinion and thought as regulated in the 1945 Indonesian Constitution.

The police should stop the examination of Mr. Erwin, and rather than bringing criminal charges against him, they should use the right to answer through media or official letters; in a democratic state, the right to answer any allegation is suggested and regulated by the law.

Furthermore, the police should respect the process undertaken by the Press Council.

I look forward to your prompt action in this matter.

Yours Sincerely,


Please send your letters to:

Thank you.


Urgent Appeals Programme

Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Top