It's Wrong to Kill Babies in Abortions Just Because They're Disabled

Micaiah Bilger

When did society begin to embrace the notion that killing a sick child is "compassionate"?

As long as the child has not been born yet, it is considered acceptable - even up to the ninth month of pregnancy - to end their life via abortion. Subjecting the sick child to a violent, premature death is embraced while protecting these innocents through pro-life laws is treated as despicable.

Case in point, the news coverage of a tragic Louisiana family's story after their unborn baby was diagnosed with a potentially fatal abnormality.

Early in her pregnancy, the mother, Nancy Davis, said her unborn baby was diagnosed with acrania, a typically fatal condition in which the baby's skull does not develop. Davis said she sought an abortion at a Baton Rouge hospital, but it refused because of the new state pro-life law.

"Basically, they said I had to carry my baby to bury my baby," Davis said at a press conference in August.

Full Text


Catholic Priest Inspires Thousands to Fight Michigan Measure for Abortions Up to Birth by Micaiah Bilger

Lila Rose Blasts Abortion: "If It's Not a Human Life, Why Do You Have to Kill It?" by Tierin-Rose Mandelburg

More Headlines…